Kardio 365 - úvodní stránka
nepřihlášen  
Change language:    

AGE – RELATED TREATMENT STRATEGY AND LONG-TERM OUTCOME IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION PATIENTS IN THE PCI ERA

J. Kaňovský, P. Kala, M. Poloczek, T. Ondrúš, R. Rokyta, M. Šmíd, J. Pospíšil, J. Knot, F. Roháč, J. Špinar (Brno, Plzeň, Praha)
Tématický okruh: Akutní koronární syndromy
Typ: Ústní sdělení - lékařské, XX. výroční sjezd ČKS

Aims: To analyze age-related differences in treatment strategies, results of PCI procedures and both in-hospital and long-term outcomes of consecutive patients suffering from acute myocardial infarction.
Methods: Retrospective multicenter analysis of 3814 consecutive acute myocardial infarction patients divided into two groups (younger population, elderly population) according to age (1800 patients ≤ 65 years and 2014 patients > 65 years).
Results: The elderly population had a significantly lower rate of coronary angiography (1726; 95.9% vs. 1860; 92.4%, p < 0.0001), PCI (1541; 85.6% vs. 1505; 74.7%, p < 0.001), achievement of optimal final TIMI flow 3 (1434; 79.7% vs. 1343; 66.7%, p < 0.001) and higher rate of unsuccessful reperfusion with final TIMI flow 0-1 (46; 2.6% vs. 78; 3.9%, p = 0.022). A total of 217 patients (5.7%) died during hospitalization, with significantly higher percentages in the elderly population (46; 2.6% vs. 171; 8.5%, p < 0.001). The long-term mortality (calculated from data for 2847 patients from 2 centers) was higher in the elderly population as well (5 years survival: 86.1% vs. 59.8%). We clearly demonstrated age as a strong discriminator for the whole population of AMI patients. Severe heart failure on admission (Killip III-IV) was associated with the worst prognosis in both groups of patients, but was less pronounced as a risk factor in the elderly (HR 6.04 vs. 3.14, p = 0.051 for Killip III and 12.24 vs. 5.65, p = 0.030 for Killip IV).
Conclusions: In the studied AMI population, older age was associated with a less pronounced impact of risk factors on long-term outcome. PCI in the elderly is at least as important as in younger patients, but its primary success rate is lower. Age was a dominant discriminating factor in all patients.